TADB
Methanospirillum hungatei JF-1 chromosome, complete genome. chromosome

# GENOME INFO
Genome size (bp) : 3544738
Link to NCBI Taxonomy Browser by Tax_id :323259
 
# TA INFO in replicon: NC_007796
#TypeToxinAntitoxinRegulatorLocationClassification(family/domain)
1 2 Mhun_0373 Mhun_0375 - 417187..418554 RelBE or parDE */RHH-RelE
2 2 Mhun_0377 Mhun_0378 - 419792..420228 hicBA */HicB-HicA
3 2 Mhun_0399 Mhun_0398 - 441743..442179 hicBA */HicB-HicA
4 2 Mhun_0428 Mhun_0429 - 495362..496248 -/HEPN-MNT
5 2 Mhun_0491 Mhun_0490 - 569290..570034 -/HEPN-MNT
6 2 Mhun_0506 Mhun_0505 - 588369..589053 vapBC */PHD-PIN
7 2 Mhun_0711 Mhun_0712 - 819647..820226 hicBA */HicB-HicA
8 2 Mhun_0714 Mhun_0713 - 820351..820880 RelBE or parDE */RHH-RelE
9 2 Mhun_0766 Mhun_0767 - 879701..880476 -/HEPN-MNT
10 2 Mhun_1046 Mhun_1047 - 1178593..1179419 -/HEPN-MNT
11 2 Mhun_1190 Mhun_1189 - 1353555..1354297 vapBC */COG2886-PIN
12 2 Mhun_1387 Mhun_1388 - 1585577..1586230 vapBC */AbrB-PIN
13 2 Mhun_1404 Mhun_1403 - 1600929..1601773 -/HEPN-MNT
14 2 Mhun_1454 Mhun_1455 - 1675693..1676308 vapBC */RHH-PIN
15 2 Mhun_1681 Mhun_1680 - 1902870..1903590 -/HEPN-MNT
16 2 Mhun_1700 Mhun_1699 - 1921029..1921570 RelBE or parDE */RHH-RelE
17 2 Mhun_1873 Mhun_1874 - 2120857..2121370 RelBE or parDE */RHH-RelE
18 2 Mhun_1911 Mhun_1910 - 2157856..2158466 vapBC */AbrB-PIN
19 2 Mhun_1916 Mhun_1917 - 2161062..2161668 vapBC */AbrB-PIN
20 2 Mhun_2149 Mhun_2150 - 2426491..2427140 vapBC */AbrB-PIN
21 2 Mhun_2422 Mhun_2423 - 2671018..2671685 -/HEPN-MNT
22 2 Mhun_2566 Mhun_2567 - 2847578..2848137 mazEF */AbrB-MazF
23 2 Mhun_2649 Mhun_2648 - 2922826..2923319 hicBA */HicB-HicA
24 2 Mhun_2655 Mhun_2654 - 2927408..2927904 RelBE or parDE */RHH-RelE
25 2 Mhun_2705 Mhun_2706 - 2981224..2981820 -/HEPN-MNT
26 2 Mhun_2708 Mhun_2707 - 2982163..2982675 RelBE or parDE */RHH-RelE
27 2 Mhun_2712 Mhun_2713 - 2985772..2986412 vapBC */AbrB-PIN
28 2 Mhun_2715 Mhun_2716 - 2986918..2987350 hicBA */HicB-HicA
29 2 Mhun_2721 Mhun_2722 - 2992561..2993291 -/HEPN-MNT
30 2 Mhun_2779 Mhun_2778 - 3047859..3048313 hicBA */HicB-HicA
31 2 Mhun_3062 Mhun_3061 - 3332757..3335070 -/HEPN-MNT
32 2 Mhun_3070 Mhun_3071 - 3345264..3345939 -/HEPN-MNT
33 2 Mhun_3091 Mhun_3092 - 3367843..3368537 -/HEPN-MNT
34 2 Mhun_3102 Mhun_3101 - 3377773..3378329 hicBA */HicB-HicA

: TA pair identified by RASTA-Bacteria .
* : TA family predicted based on the TA domain pair using the relationship in Table S2

The further putative TA pairs predicted by RASTA-Bacteria .
#ToxinDomain1Score1AntitoxinDomain2Score2Replicon
1Mhun_2713-67.68Mhun_2712COG1848/PIN/VapC70.74NC_007796
2Mhun_0577-68.13Mhun_0578PIN70NC_007796
3Mhun_1699-63Mhun_1700RelE78.92NC_007796
4Mhun_0586COG172482.71Mhun_0585COG159886.22NC_007796
5Mhun_2778COG159885.26Mhun_2779COG172488.13NC_007796
6Mhun_2150AbrB/SpoVT_AbrB85.14Mhun_2149COG1848/PIN/VapC87.12NC_007796
7Mhun_1910AbrB86.41Mhun_1911PIN/VapC/COG1848/COG411387.73NC_007796
8Mhun_0712COG159882.68Mhun_0711COG172487.97NC_007796
9Mhun_0398COG159883.03Mhun_0399COG172484.32NC_007796
10Mhun_0370-62.19Mhun_0371COG159882.71NC_007796
11Mhun_2716COG159884.19Mhun_2715COG172484.32NC_007796
12Mhun_0378COG159883.81Mhun_0377COG172484.19NC_007796
13Mhun_1874-66.22Mhun_1873RelE/Plasmid_killer80.15NC_007796
14Mhun_1917-66.22Mhun_1916COG1848/PIN/VapC/COG411371.63NC_007796
15Mhun_0333-66.22Mhun_0334COG1848/PIN/VapC73.86NC_007796
16Mhun_2154-67.1Mhun_2155COG1848/PIN/VapC73.35NC_007796
17Mhun_0372-62.71Mhun_0373RelE77.29NC_007796
18Mhun_1631-62.9Mhun_1630MazF/PemK74.88NC_007796
19Mhun_1455-62.81Mhun_1454VapC/PIN/COG184872.81NC_007796
20Mhun_2110-65Mhun_2111PIN/COG184872.61NC_007796
21Mhun_0752-68.35Mhun_0751RelE80.37NC_007796
22Mhun_1662-68.35Mhun_1663VapC/PIN/COG1848/COG411374.18NC_007796
23Mhun_2567-66.22Mhun_2566PemK/MazF74NC_007796
24Mhun_1879-64.87Mhun_1880RelE78.86NC_007796
Note: The RASTA-Bacteria algorithm utilises rpsblast search and typical characteristics of TA loci, such as a two-gene, co-directed module coding for small proteins, to identify TA hits. RASTA-Bacteria TA pair hits with one score >70% and the other > 60% were recorded by TADB, this strict cut-off yields broadly reliable TA candidates.